<output id="qn6qe"></output>

    1. <output id="qn6qe"><tt id="qn6qe"></tt></output>
    2. <strike id="qn6qe"></strike>

      亚洲 日本 欧洲 欧美 视频,日韩中文字幕有码av,一本一道av中文字幕无码,国产线播放免费人成视频播放,人妻少妇偷人无码视频,日夜啪啪一区二区三区,国产尤物精品自在拍视频首页,久热这里只有精品12

      MySQL Binlog Mixed模式記錄成Row格式

      背景:

            一個簡單的主從結構,主的binlog format是Mixed模式,在執行一條簡單的導入語句時,通過mysqlbinlog導出發現記錄的Binlog全部變成了Row的格式(明明設置的是Mixed),現在就說說在什么情況下Binlog的Mixed模式會轉變記錄成Row格式。

      概念:

            binlog format有三種形式:Statement、Mixed、Row,具體的信息可以自行到網上搜查。

      分析(本文碰到的案例):

      查看MySQL binlog format

      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:33:39>show variables like 'binlog_format%';                                                                                                   +---------------+-------+
      | Variable_name | Value |
      +---------------+-------+
      | binlog_format | MIXED |
      +---------------+-------+

      測試語句:

      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:24:14>create table tmp_test(id int,name varchar(64),age int,primary key(id)) engine = innodb;
      Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.05 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:24:23>insert into tmp_test values(1,'aaa',11);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:17>insert into tmp_test values(2,'bbb',22);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.02 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:23>insert into tmp_test values(3,'ccc',33);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:28>insert into tmp_test values(4,'ddd',44);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:34>insert into tmp_test values(5,'eee',55);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.01 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:42>select * from tmp_test;
      +----+------+------+
      | id | name | age  |
      +----+------+------+
      |  1 | aaa  |   11 |
      |  2 | bbb  |   22 |
      |  3 | ccc  |   33 |
      |  4 | ddd  |   44 |
      |  5 | eee  |   55 |
      +----+------+------+
      5 rows in set (0.01 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:25:50>create table tmp_test_bak(id int,name varchar(64),age int,primary key(id)) engine = innodb;
      Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.03 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 02:26:31>insert into tmp_test_bak select * from tmp_test;   ###記錄成了Row模式
      Query OK, 5 rows affected (0.03 sec)
      Records: 5  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0

      Binlog 記錄圖:

      問題來了,我想要出來的binlog format是Statement,而不是Row。而一條insert into tb select * from ta的簡單語句在Mixed模式下記錄了Row模式的binlog。原因是什么?

      首先確實在一些特定的情況下,Mixed會被轉換成Row模式

      . 當 DML 語句更新一個 NDB 表時;
      . 當函數中包含 UUID() 時;
      . 2 個及以上包含 AUTO_INCREMENT 字段的表被更新時;
      . 執行 INSERT DELAYED 語句時;
      . 用 UDF 時;
      . 視圖中必須要求運用 row 時,例如建立視圖時使用了 UUID() 函數;

      上面來自網絡,有興趣的可以自己測試測試。而對于本文中的sql,符合不了上面的條件,但binlog也記錄成了Row格式。所以還是很奇怪為什么binlog格式被轉換了,日常工作的時候有遇到過執行一條sql,會報一個warning:

      Warning: Unsafe statement written to the binary log using statement format since BINLOG_FORMAT = STATEMENT

      難道因為這個導致轉換的?因為上面的SQL可以重現,沒有報warning,所以這個情況排除。根據經驗想到了一個參數:innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog,看到里面講到事務隔離級別,那就看看隔離級別的情況:

      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 05:46:56>select @@global.tx_isolation;
      +-----------------------+
      | @@global.tx_isolation |
      +-----------------------+
      | READ-COMMITTED        |
      +-----------------------+
      1 row in set (0.01 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:36:45>select @@session.tx_isolation;
      +------------------------+
      | @@session.tx_isolation |
      +------------------------+
      | READ-COMMITTED         |
      +------------------------+
      1 row in set (0.01 sec)

      看到隔離級別是提交讀,即不可重復讀。把事務隔離級別設置成默認的 REPEATABLE READ:

      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:41:02>set session transaction isolation level REPEATABLE READ;                                                                              
      Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:41:42>select @@session.tx_isolation;
      +------------------------+
      | @@session.tx_isolation |
      +------------------------+
      | REPEATABLE-READ        |
      +------------------------+
      1 row in set (0.00 sec)

      再執行測試里的SQL,發現這時候Mixed的binlog記錄了Statement格式,正常了,符合預期了。難道就是這個事務隔離級別的問題引起的?在手冊里發現了這句:

      Note
      In MySQL 5.7, when READ COMMITTED isolation level is used, or the deprecated innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog system variable is enabled, 
      there is no InnoDB gap locking except for foreign-key constraint checking and duplicate-key checking. Also, record locks for nonmatching 
      rows are released after MySQL has evaluated the WHERE condition.
      
      If you use READ COMMITTED or enable innodb_locks_unsafe_for_binlog, you must use row-based binary logging.

      展開可以看例子:

      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:49:27>select @@session.tx_isolation;
      +------------------------+
      | @@session.tx_isolation |
      +------------------------+
      | REPEATABLE-READ        |
      +------------------------+
      1 row in set (0.01 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:49:29>create table tmp_test_bak(id int,name varchar(64),age int,primary key(id)) engine = innodb;                                                
      Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:49:34>insert into tmp_test_bak values(1,'aaa',11);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.13 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:49:41>insert into tmp_test_bak values(2,'bbb',22);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.11 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:49:41>insert into tmp_test_bak values(3,'ccc',33);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.11 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:49:42>insert into tmp_test_bak values(4,'ddd',44);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.11 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:49:42>insert into tmp_test_bak values(5,'eee',55);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.13 sec)
      
      BINLOG:
      root@dba:/var/log/mysql# mysqlbinlog mysql-bin.000007 |grep "tmp_test_bak"
      create table tmp_test_bak(id int,name varchar(64),age int,primary key(id)) engine = innodb
      insert into tmp_test_bak values(1,'aaa',11)
      insert into tmp_test_bak values(2,'bbb',22)
      insert into tmp_test_bak values(3,'ccc',33)
      insert into tmp_test_bak values(4,'ddd',44)
      insert into tmp_test_bak values(5,'eee',55)
      
      #############################
      #############################
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:49:43>set session transaction isolation level READ COMMITTED;
      Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:50:21>flush logs;                                                                                                                                
      
      Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.21 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:50:23>create table tmp_test(id int,name varchar(64),age int,primary key(id)) engine = innodb;
      Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.14 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:50:49>insert into tmp_test values(1,'aaa',11);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.13 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:50:54>insert into tmp_test values(2,'bbb',22);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.11 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:50:54>insert into tmp_test values(3,'ccc',33);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.11 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:50:54>insert into tmp_test values(4,'ddd',44);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.11 sec)
      
      dba@192.168.111.4 : dba_test 06:50:54>insert into tmp_test values(5,'eee',55);
      Query OK, 1 row affected (0.12 sec)
      
      BINLOG:
      root@pubmed2:/var/log/mysql# mysqlbinlog -vv mysql-bin.000008 |grep "tmp_test"
      create table tmp_test(id int,name varchar(64),age int,primary key(id)) engine = innodb
      #160426 18:50:54 server id 1  end_log_pos 395     Table_map: `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test` mapped to number 44
      ### INSERT INTO `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test`
      #160426 18:50:54 server id 1  end_log_pos 597     Table_map: `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test` mapped to number 44
      ### INSERT INTO `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test`
      #160426 18:50:54 server id 1  end_log_pos 799     Table_map: `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test` mapped to number 44
      ### INSERT INTO `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test`
      #160426 18:50:54 server id 1  end_log_pos 1001     Table_map: `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test` mapped to number 44
      ### INSERT INTO `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test`
      #160426 18:50:55 server id 1  end_log_pos 1203     Table_map: `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test` mapped to number 44
      ### INSERT INTO `pubmed_data`.`tmp_test`
      View Code

      經過測試,在5.1、5.5、5.6都有這個情況,可能這個本身就不是問題。:)

      總結:

            除了上面說的一些條件影響binlog的記錄格式外(Statement 到 Row),事務隔離也影響這binlog的記錄格式行為

      posted @ 2016-04-26 19:08  jyzhou  閱讀(11106)  評論(0)    收藏  舉報
      主站蜘蛛池模板: 色噜噜一区二区三区| 国产日韩AV免费无码一区二区三区| 久久91精品牛牛| 国产精品成人久久电影| 久久av无码精品人妻系列试探| 激情内射亚洲一区二区三区| 国产精品无码a∨麻豆| 修武县| 国产无遮挡裸体免费久久| 国内自拍偷拍一区二区三区| 风韵丰满熟妇啪啪区老熟熟女| 少妇被粗大的猛烈xx动态图| 色偷偷女人的天堂亚洲网| 久久精品波多野结衣| 久久精品国产福利亚洲av| 四虎影视一区二区精品| 美乳丰满人妻无码视频| 耿马| 99re6这里有精品热视频| 精品国产福利一区二区| 日本欧美大码a在线观看| 99网友自拍视频在线| 中文字幕无码成人免费视频| 最近中文字幕国产精选| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品| 无码a∨高潮抽搐流白浆| 日韩中文字幕一二三视频| 国产自产av一区二区三区性色| 亚洲性日韩精品一区二区三区| 韩国无码AV片午夜福利| 国产高清一区二区三区视频| 无码福利写真片视频在线播放| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽| 国产无遮挡又黄又大又爽| 麻豆国产AV剧情偷闻女邻居内裤| 国产中文三级全黄| 搡老熟女老女人一区二区| 91精品国产老熟女在线| 麻豆国产成人AV在线播放| 99精品久久免费精品久久|