<output id="qn6qe"></output>

    1. <output id="qn6qe"><tt id="qn6qe"></tt></output>
    2. <strike id="qn6qe"></strike>

      亚洲 日本 欧洲 欧美 视频,日韩中文字幕有码av,一本一道av中文字幕无码,国产线播放免费人成视频播放,人妻少妇偷人无码视频,日夜啪啪一区二区三区,国产尤物精品自在拍视频首页,久热这里只有精品12

      SharePoint 2010 vs SharePoint 2013

      * From a document collaboration perspective, the structures of both versions are the same – so if you create a metadata architecture for documents in 2010 it should be fully upgradable to 2013.

      * The most significant upgrades in document management are in the user experience – including drag and drop to upload documents and the ability to edit managed metadata in a datasheet view.

      *The primary differences are in the social experiences, especially with discussion boards. The 2013 discussion board (with Community features enabled) creates and engaging “Facebook-like” activity stream, which is far more user-friendly than the same feature in SharePoint 2010. The added visual appeal is important because getting people to use the discussion board instead of commonly used “who you know” networks will take some planning and effort. If the software is engaging and familiar it will help with “stickiness.”

      *The other significant improvement is search, which you will see in the examples on the next few pages.

      Business Scenario SharePoint 2010 SharePoint 2013 Document Collaboration

      ? Support for enterprise content types and shared metadata so that attributes and structures can be maintained in one place and shared across the enterprise, vastly improving search results. ? No difference in approach for organizing content so investment in defining content types and metadata is fully leveraged in 2013. ? Several helpful user experience improvements in the application of metadata, including the ability to edit managed metadata in a datasheet (spreadsheet) view.

      ? “Drag and drop” ability to upload documents to SharePoint libraries (without having to open library in “explorer view’). Search ? Comprehensive enterprise search with the ability to use Boolean operators to create search queries. For example: search for: cats AND dogs.

      ? Wildcard search available. For example, as search for ho* would find homes, horses, houses, etc.

      ? Faceted search refiners to easily narrow results based on metadata.

      ? Define search scopes to target to specific collections of content.

      ? “Best bets” can be defined to force certain results to the top of search results.

      ? Significant improvements in user experience.

      ? Visual display of contents as you hover in search results.

      ? Best bets now called Promoted Results.

      ? Search remembers what you have previously searched and clicked and displays these values as query suggestions at the top of the results page.

      ? Results show number of times a document has been viewed.

      ? Results pages allows you to page through PowerPoint presentations without leaving the search results page. ? One click to “view in library.”

      Reference: https://docsbay.net/sharepoint-2010-vs-sharepoint-2013-feature-comparison

      sharepoint-2010-vs-sharepoint-2013-feature-comparison

      posted on 2019-03-14 22:25  椰子樹  閱讀(325)  評論(0)    收藏  舉報

      主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产婷婷色一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久久网| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区好看电影| 97久久久亚洲综合久久| 精品国产国语对白主播野战| 精品亚洲精品日韩精品| 日韩av一区二区不卡在线| 国产精品国产三级国产专| 亚洲欧美综合中文| 97无码人妻福利免费公开在线视频| 亚洲av本道一区二区| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁2020 | 97在线视频人妻无码| 成人无码潮喷在线观看| 欲香欲色天天天综合和网| 天天澡天天揉揉av无码| 国产亚洲精品中文字幕| 国产真人性做爰久久网站 | 亚洲www永久成人网站| 国产成人av一区二区三区不卡| 日韩中文字幕免费在线观看| 久热这里只有精品视频3| 亚洲精选av一区二区| 97se亚洲综合自在线| 综合图区亚洲另类偷窥| 国内不卡的一区二区三区| 性做久久久久久久| 人妻少妇偷人精品视频| 国产女人在线视频| 精品日韩色国产在线观看| 热久久美女精品天天吊色 | 中文字幕成熟丰满人妻| 国产精品无码a∨精品| 中文字幕亚洲精品人妻| 新巴尔虎右旗| 久久99久国产麻精品66| 综合图区亚洲欧美另类图片| 漂亮人妻中文字幕丝袜| 日韩一区二区在线观看的| 国产精品爽爽久久久久久| 亚洲欧美不卡视频在线播放|